Putnam County school districts

Putnam County school districts recognized for best-in-class efficiency

Pictured: Bob Jennell, Superintendent of Columbus Grove Local Schools, Kevin Brinkman, Superintendent of Ottawa-Glandorf Local School District, Don Horstman, Superintendent of Kalida Local Schools and Scott Mangas, Superintendent of Ottoville Local Schools.
These Northwestern Ohio school districts have been recognized by Ohio Education Matters for best-in-class efficiency in the folloing areas:

  • Columbus Grove: Transportation and School Administration
  • Kalida: Food Service
  • Ottowa-Glandorf: Food Service, School Administration and Transportation
  • Ottoville: Maintenance

APRIL 19 - The Ottawa-Glandorf Local School District is one of the most efficient school districts in the state in providing non-instructional services, outpacing other similar districts in food-service, school administration, and transportation costs, Ohio Education Matters announced today.

Ottawa-Glandorf was presented today with certificates of achievement as “best-in-class” in providing non-instructional services more efficiently than other similar districts in the state. The certificate was issued by Ohio Education Matters, a subsidiary of KnowledgeWorks in Cincinnati.

“Ottawa-Glandorf has shown that it can deliver quality services at a lower cost than most other districts in the state,” said Andrew Benson, Executive Director of Ohio Education Matters. “The taxpayers and residents of this community should be proud that their district takes seriously the best use of resources to benefit children.”

The rating stems from a report issued by Ohio Education Matters this year as part of its nine-month study of K-12 education called Ohio Smart Schools. That report, titled Benchmarking Ohio’s School Districts: Identifying districts that get more for their money in non-instructional spending, identified 135 school districts across Ohio that seem to get more for their money in central-office administration, school-level administration, food service, student transportation, and building maintenance and operations than other similar districts.

“School districts that are not as efficient as these best-in-class districts should look to them to learn how they are doing more with less,” said Mr. Benson. “By spending less in these non-instructional areas and yet still meeting minimal quality standards, these districts are ensuring that more dollars are getting into its classrooms to help support students.”
In its presentation today, Ohio Education Matters noted the following:

  • In providing food service, Ottawa-Glandorf was among the most efficient districts among rural and small-town districts with moderate to high median incomes, spending $2.87 per meal. That compared to similar school districts that spent as much as $5.89 per meal. The benchmark average for similar districts was $2.73.
  • In providing transportation, Ottawa-Glandorf was among the most efficient districts among its peers, spending $30,980.31 per bus. That compared to similar school districts that spent as much as $62,000 per bus. The benchmark average for similar districts was $33,566.84 per bus.
  • In providing school-level administration, Ottawa-Glandorf was among the most efficient districts among its peers spending $420.66 per pupil. That compared to similar school districts that spent as much as $731.50 per student. The benchmark average for similar districts was $406.15 per pupil.
  • Other Putnam County districts to be recognized include Kalida Local Schools (food service), Ottoville Local Schools (Maintenance), and Columbus Grove Local Schools (School Administration and Transportation).

“We think it is reasonable to assume that if this best-in-class district can achieve these kinds of efficiencies, so can other districts that are similar,” said Benson. Researchers from Ohio Education Matters are spending time with the best-in-class Ohio school districts to learn from them how they achieved their efficiencies and what others may do to emulate those best practices.

“The state should be highlighting these efficient districts and rewarding them by protecting them from deeper cuts in state aid than less efficient districts,” Benson said. “That will encourage others to make changes that will make them more efficient in delivering non-instructional services, which frees up more dollars for the classroom.”

Across the state, Ohio school districts could save nearly $1.4 billion a year if they were able to emulate the best practices of the most efficient districts in the state – a savings that approximates the cuts the state is seeking in primary and secondary education in the next biennium.
The benchmarking study grouped Ohio school districts with similar districts and identified those that were spending less but also meeting minimal quality indicators in each service area. The 5% lowest spending districts in each category meeting quality levels were designated the best-in-class. A comparison was then made to those districts in each group that spent more than the best-in-class, and the study found that all Ohio school districts could potentially save the following:

  • $125.6 million in student transportation
  • $138 million in food service
  • $240 million school-building level administration
  • $248 million in central-office administration
  • $617.9 million in building maintenance and operations

Across those non-instructional spending areas, school districts could save $1.370 billion a year, which is a savings of 20% across all non-instructional spending in Ohio school districts.